Journal 20: October 12

I was reading an article this morning about bad Web sites. I was kind of shocked to hear the writer's opinion that it's easy to find good sites. I don't know if I agree with that. Sure, most of the Internet is functional and with purpose, but that should be the standard and not the standout. I think for a Web site to be considered good, it must transcend its common denominator and rise above the competition. Maybe I'm too picky, but I don't think everyone can be the best. I mean, if mediocre quality gets recognized, everyone will just shoot for that as a goal, and no boundaries get pushed. I don't think technology should ever stay stagnant.